
Mr. Bates was a 74-year old widower with a $500,000 term policy and a cash surrender value of $0. His current annual premiums were $12,500. Since there was no longer a need for the policy, his advisor suggested that rather than letting it lapse and receive nothing, he explore a life settlement as an alternative.
A life settlement expert was able to solicit multiple bids from a variety of institutional funders around the world. Within two months, Mr. Chambers accepted a top offer of $114,500 for the policy. Upon receipt of the payout, Mr. Chambers promptly placed the cash into his grandson's college fund.
Ms. Williams' marketing agency was still making high premium payments on her retired partner's $3.5 million policy. There were loans secured by the policy of $500,000 with the net death benefit being $3 million after deducting the loans.
Since the policy was now outdated and the premiums were a liability, she considered cashing in the policy for its cash surrender value of $850,000. Instead, her company's CPA suggested that she utilize a life settlement broker to sell the policy on the secondary market.
The policy fetched a price of over $1.3 million on the secondary market, which yielded $550,000 more than the cash surrender value.
Mr. and Mrs. Chambers held a $1.4 million joint survivorship policy that matured at age 95. The policy was not performing and the premiums were due to increase from $16,000 per year to $24,000.
Because of their age (75 and 76, respectively) and other qualifying factors, their life insurance agent realized that a life settlement would be a viable option. Their policy was sold on the secondary market for a total of $175,000. The proceeds from the sale were used to purchase a new joint life survivorship policy with a lifetime maturity and contractual annual premiums of $14,000.
In the end, Mr. and Ms. Chambers were able to obtain a better, locked-in insurance contract while reducing their premiums by almost $13,000 per year.